nikolios έγραψε:Αυτα που ποσταρες πρεπει να ηταν benchmarks της AMD τα οποια δεν ξερω πως τα βγαλε, τα εχω δει και γω παντως.
Σημερα ομως που βγηκε η καρτα και εχει reviews και frame rate tests δειχνει να υπολειπεται της 980 ti εστω και ελαχιστα. Βασικα ειναι σχεδον ισοδυναμες.
Μαλλον το παιχνιδι θα παιχτει στο overclocking.
Απ' ότι διάβασα στο IGN, η Fury δεν είναι overclockable.
http://www.ign.com/articles/2015/06/24/amd-radeon-r9-fury-x-review"
OverclockingAMD has marketed the Fury X as being designed for overclocking—and since it’s water-cooled and runs at just 50°C, you would think there’s a lot of headroom for overclocking…but we had no luck with it. In the documentation that AMD shared, it says that a 100Mhz overclock netted about 5% gains in a few games such as Far Cry 4. That’s nothing to write home about, especially considering Nvidia’s Maxwell GPUs clock up to about 1.4GHz with relative ease. We tried using AMD’s PowerTune and got a 6% overclock out of it, but that’s not impressive; it only yielded about one or two fps more in games. When we asked AMD about it, we were told that the amount of overclocking possible will vary from card to card, and so it could not offer a general range one could expect—which is disappointing on such a well-cooled GPU.
We also discovered AMD has removed the ability to tweak the memory clocks, but it’s probably not necessary since the memory likely isn’t a bottleneck."